Sci got very interested in the responses to her last post asking educators (and others), if they used my blog in teaching and why.
I’d like to follow up more on this, and ask another question:
What are the signs of a good basic blog? Breadth of coverage? In depth? Cited sources? What makes a basic blog a GOOD basic blog? What do you value, and what would you like to see more of?
And don’t limit this to just the educators! Readers, if you aren’t a neuroscientist, what are the signs of a good blog outside your field? What would you like to see less or more of?
Let me know. Sci needs some ANECDOTES. And then we’ll come around to collecting some data. 🙂
